Imagine that a teacher assigns to write a Rogerian style essay and does not explain the details. There is no need to panic since a well-structured and concise Rogerian argument essay example would come in handy in this situation. The long literature guides would take more time and might even confuse one that is why it is better to read Rogerian argument essay example to understand how to make it right. After scanning a Rogerian argument essay example, one would notice that the content and the precise construction of the paper plays the main role. That is why it is important to keep in mind several hints that would make the paper easy-to-read and informative.
For the purposes of this essay, the topic of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing will be discussed.
1.First of all, it is important to clarify that the first part of a Rogerian essay should include a hook, a problem, background information, and a thesis.
What were the reasons for bombing the two industrial cities of Japan during the WW2? The question of the necessity of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki has not yet been agreed upon. Unlike President Robert Freeman who said that the US had no alternative resolution for the WW2 that would save more people than the population of the two cities, the other participants of the war claim that the bombing was a demonstration of the military power of the US armed forces. The analysis of the personal diary of President Freeman shows that the decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was timely and was not supported by the Chicago University scientists who developed the bomb.
2.Classically, the Rogerian essay has to have five paragraphs. The first paragraph of the body should dwell upon the reasons why President allowed the bombing.
The president of the US wrote in his diary that he could not even predict the power of the atomic bombs invented in the America. Also, he claimed that if America did not show its power with launching a nuclear weapon, the Nazi Germany surely would do it to the US, Great Britain, and USSR.
3.The third paragraph will tell about the historical circumstances in Japan.
In 1945, Japan was losing its position and the emperor was close to giving up. In fact, his official letter to Freeman, Churchill, and Stalin was ignored due to the desire to see the power of the bombs. Still, the US commanders justified their decision saying that the destruction of the two cities that produced the arms for the US’s enemies would save more lives of Americans than sending the soldiers on the Japanese bays.
4.The third body paragraph should connect the two opposing ideas.
Having a strong support of the American population, as well as the desire of the military forces of the US to demonstrate its superiority, the president of the US Robert Freeman decided to use the weapons of mass destruction. This step was not necessary if to look from the side of military power since Japan’s military forces were devastated and lacked an appropriate armory. This fact has led to the acknowledgment of the Japan’s inferiority expressed in a direct letter addressed to Freeman, Churchill, and Stalin.
5.The conclusion is the last paragraph of the Rogerian paper that sums up and analyses the discussed ideas.
Historically-wise, the decision of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was rather an attempt of military power demonstration rather than a necessary step for finishing the WW2. Having gained a support of the American society, President Freeman used a radically new type of weapons that led to massive human destruction in Japan.